How did a first-semester course invented by a mystic in a Weimar villa in 1919 end up as the template for every design foundation programme taught in the world today? The Bauhaus preliminary course — the Vorkurs — ran for fourteen years, under three directors, in three cities, taught by four very different men. Students spent six months, sometimes a full year, before they were allowed near a workshop. They cut paper. They stacked wire. They studied a leaf until they could draw its structure with their eyes closed. Foundation, our own modular exercise in circles, arcs and bars, is that first week of school, set as a poster.
1919, Weimar: Itten Arrives and the Vorkurs Becomes the Gate
When Gropius opened the school in the spring of 1919, he needed a first-year teacher and hired Johannes Itten on the strength of a Vienna reputation and a private art school Itten had already been running with something resembling doctrine. Itten arrived shaved-headed, robed, on a diet of garlic and mush. He brought Mazdaznan breathing exercises into the classroom before he brought pencils. Students were asked to move their arms in warm-up rhythms, to breathe until they were dizzy, to feel a material before drawing it. This is easy to mock and worth taking seriously. Itten's premise was that a student who had spent years in an academy copying casts of Roman busts had to be emptied out before anything could be built.
The exercises themselves were austere. Contrast studies: rough against smooth, light against heavy, matte against gloss. Material collages assembled from scraps found in the workshop — wood shavings, metal filings, glass, moss — glued onto board and read the way a musician reads a chord. Analytical drawings of natural forms: a thistle, a bone, a shell, taken apart into its structural logic. And the colour star, Itten's own diagram, which sorted hue, value and saturation into a rational device a first-year could hold in one hand. By 1920 the Vorkurs was compulsory. No student entered a workshop without passing it. The gate was set.
1923, Weimar: Moholy-Nagy Replaces the Mystic and Keeps the Course
The Itten years ended in a fight that was partly about robes and partly about the future of the school. Gropius wanted the Bauhaus to make things that could be produced by industry. Itten wanted the Bauhaus to make artists whose interior life was in order. The two positions were, in the end, incompatible, and Itten left in the spring of 1923. His replacement, arriving that autumn, was László Moholy-Nagy — twenty-eight, Hungarian, a constructivist who wore a boiler suit and photographed with a hand-held camera at odd angles.
Moholy-Nagy inherited the Vorkurs and did not dismantle it. He kept the material studies, the contrast exercises, the analytical drawings from nature. What he changed was the register. Where Itten wanted students to feel wood, Moholy-Nagy wanted them to test its tensile limits. Balance studies replaced meditation: a stack of wire, wood and glass that had to stand on the smallest possible base without collapsing. Light studies replaced colour mysticism: paper cut into cones and folded into planes, photographed against a raking lamp to record how a form behaved as a shadow. Photograms — camera-less photographs made by laying objects on light-sensitive paper — entered the course. The Vorkurs was no longer the antechamber to a workshop. It had become the workshop itself, with a smaller table.
1925, Dessau: Albers Takes the First Semester and Hands Out Paper
The move from Weimar to Dessau in the spring of 1925 was forced by a hostile state government and financed by a friendlier city. It also produced the school's most consequential internal appointment. Josef Albers, who had entered the Bauhaus as a student in 1920 and stayed on to teach in the stained-glass workshop, was given the first semester of the preliminary course. He would hold it, in various configurations with Moholy-Nagy, until 1928, and then alone.
Albers's Vorkurs was the version that leaked into every design school on earth. He handed each student a single sheet of paper and gave them one instruction: make it structural. No glue, no additions, no cuts that removed material — only folds and slits. The exercise was severe and generous at the same time. It refused every crutch — colour, ornament, virtuosity — and rewarded the student who found, in a rectangle of paper, a form that could stand up on its own edge and cast a coherent shadow. Sheet metal followed. Wire followed. Then wood. Each material was interrogated for what it could do that no other material could do. Ascending Forms, our own rectangles climbing a frame in measured proportion, is a distant descendant of the paper exercise: the same premise, that a stack of simple elements, ordered well, has more to say than any elaborate figure.
1928, Dessau: The Course Becomes an Institution and Loses Its Founder
By 1928 the Bauhaus had a new building, a new director and, quietly, a mature preliminary course. Gropius resigned in the spring of that year and was succeeded by the Swiss architect Hannes Meyer, who saw the school as an instrument of social production rather than a laboratory of form. Meyer's tenure was short and combative, and it ended in 1930 with Mies van der Rohe taking over. Through all of this, the Vorkurs stayed roughly where Albers had left it.
That stability is the interesting fact. The workshops changed hands, the political weather in Dessau turned first sour and then dangerous, the curriculum around the preliminary course was reorganised more than once — and yet the first semester kept doing the same thing. A student arriving in October was handed paper, then metal, then wire. A student sitting in Kandinsky's parallel course on form was asked, in the questionnaire that would not die, which colour belonged with the triangle, which with the square, which with the circle. A student in Klee's course was asked to draw a line as if it were taking a walk. The preliminary course had become, by then, less a personality and more an institution — which is what Gropius had wanted from the beginning, and what Itten had made almost impossible. Dessau Morning, our own low sun over stacked horizontal bands, is a picture of that period: quiet geometry, workshop light, the school working.
1933, Berlin: The School Closes and the Preliminary Course Emigrates
The Dessau council, dominated by National Socialists after the 1931 elections, moved to shut the school in the summer of 1932. Mies rented a former telephone factory in a Berlin suburb and reopened the Bauhaus as a private institution that autumn. The Berlin school lasted less than a year. In April 1933 the Gestapo sealed the building; a few months later, unable to operate under the conditions imposed on it, the faculty voted to dissolve the school. What had been the most influential design institution in Europe closed for the third time, and this time did not reopen.
The preliminary course, however, did not close. It emigrated. Albers left for the United States in the autumn of 1933 and set up his first-semester exercises at Black Mountain College in North Carolina, then at Yale. Moholy-Nagy went first to London and then to Chicago, where he founded the New Bauhaus in 1937 and made a version of the Vorkurs the entry course of what would become the Institute of Design. Every American art and design school that adopted a foundation year in the following two decades — and by the 1960s that was most of them — was working from a translation of what had been taught in a Dessau classroom five years earlier. Archway, our own gateway of nested arcs rising from a base, sits well as the emblem of that transmission: the same form, opened up, walked through, found again on the other side.
What It All Means: The Vorkurs as the Bauhaus's Real Thesis
The Bauhaus is remembered for its buildings, its chairs, its lamps and its typography. Those objects survive, and they are worth arguing about. But the school's most durable output was not a chair. It was a way of beginning. The Vorkurs is the reason a first-year student in a design programme today is likely to spend a week folding paper before touching a computer, why a colour theory class opens with hue against value rather than with a wheel of names, why the first drawing exercise in most foundation courses is a study of a natural object taken apart into structure. None of this is neutral common sense. It was invented, argued over, revised and defended by four men in three cities across fourteen years, and it worked so well that it now looks like the way things obviously are.
What the preliminary course really proposed was that form is teachable. Not taste, not talent, not vision — those were left, correctly, to the student. But the grammar of form — how a plane behaves, how a line reads against a mass, how a colour shifts when the colour next to it changes — could be laid out as clearly as harmony in a music theory class. Once a student had the grammar, they could go anywhere: weaving workshop, metal workshop, typography, stage, architecture. The Vorkurs was not a bottleneck. It was a shared vocabulary.
That is also the premise underneath a generative composition. When we set a seed and let the code place circles, arcs and bars into a modular grid, we are, at some remove, doing the Albers paper exercise: taking a small vocabulary of elements and asking what a single sheet of them can be made to say. Foundation, the composition in our /shop/ that names itself after the course, is not a tribute. It is the same exercise, still worth doing.
FAQ
Who actually invented the Bauhaus preliminary course?
Johannes Itten designed the first version in Weimar between 1919 and 1923, drawing on a private art school he had run in Vienna. But the course most people mean when they say "Vorkurs" — paper studies, material logic, no mysticism — was substantially reshaped by László Moholy-Nagy from 1923 and by Josef Albers in Dessau from 1925. Three teachers, one course, evolving continuously. Attribution to any single figure is misleading.
How long did the Vorkurs actually last for a student?
In Itten's version it ran for a full year and was the sole gate to the workshops. Under Moholy-Nagy and Albers it settled to one semester, usually six months, sometimes extended into a second semester for students not yet ready. A student who failed the preliminary course could not proceed to a specialised workshop. The Bauhaus took this seriously; the gate was real.
Did students really only work with paper in the first weeks?
Paper was the first material because it was cheap, universal and unforgiving. Under Albers the opening exercise was almost always to make a single sheet structural using only folds and slits. Sheet metal, wire and wood followed in sequence. Colour and analytical drawing ran in parallel courses taught by Kandinsky and Klee. So paper dominated the opening weeks but never stood alone.
What did Kandinsky's colour and form course actually cover?
Kandinsky's parallel course examined the relationship between elementary forms — triangle, square, circle — and primary colours. The famous questionnaire asked students which colour belonged with which shape; Kandinsky's own answer was yellow triangle, red square, blue circle. The course also covered composition on the picture plane, tension between elements, and the analytical reading of line, point and plane as basic units.
Why did the Bauhaus close, and what happened to the course?
The school closed three times: Weimar in 1925 under political pressure, Dessau in 1932 after the National Socialist majority took the council, and Berlin in the summer of 1933 when the Gestapo sealed the building. The preliminary course, however, emigrated. Albers took it to Black Mountain College and then Yale; Moholy-Nagy took it to Chicago and the New Bauhaus. It spread through American design education from there.
Is the Vorkurs still taught anywhere in its original form?
Not exactly. No school runs Itten's breathing exercises or Albers's precise paper sequence unchanged. But most design and architecture programmes worldwide open with a foundation year descended, at one or two removes, from the Bauhaus preliminary course. The paper-folding first exercise, the material logic sequence, the parallel colour and form theory — these arrived in curricula through Albers at Yale and Moholy-Nagy in Chicago, and they stayed.
What is the connection between the Vorkurs and generative geometry?
The preliminary course proposed that a small vocabulary of forms — plane, line, colour, elementary shape — could be recombined into a very large number of coherent compositions if the grammar was clear. Generative geometry works on the same premise, with code doing the recombination. Setting a seed and letting a routine place circles, arcs and bars into a modular grid is Albers's paper exercise, extended by another tool.
What did the Vorkurs deliberately leave out?
It did not teach style, taste or subject matter. Students were not shown what to make paintings of, or which architectural movement to align with, or how to develop a personal signature. Those decisions were left to the individual once the grammar of form was in hand. This is why graduates fanned out into weaving, metalwork, typography, stage design and architecture without the course feeling contradicted. The Vorkurs taught grammar, not sentences.
From the collection
New compositions and 10% off your first print.
One email now with your code. No noise after.